Archive for the 'Debian/Ubuntu' Category

Debian’s KVM + Ubuntu karmic => bug?

Tuesday, December 22nd, 2009

I’ve been playing with virtualization, and KVM in particular. However, I’m running into an interesting problem. Below is how Ubuntu Netbook Remix look inside my KVM (either using virt-viewer, virt-manager or directly KVM to display the VM). Note how the top panel is fine. I’m using KVM 88 from experimental (but I had the same […]

PTS as a great tool for upstream developers

Monday, March 3rd, 2008

I recently realized how nice the Packages Tracking System is for upstream developers who want to follow the status of their software in Debian. By subscribing, they can easily monitor (and reply to) bug reports, and the general status of their software in Debian. I’m trying to help with coreutils maintainance, and it’s great to […]

mailing list for cross-distributions collaboration

Saturday, March 1st, 2008

A few months ago, I asked a set of questions on development mailing lists of a few GNU/Linux distributions. This resulted in very interesting discussions. As promised back then, all the answers from all distros I contacted can be read on the web or as an mbox file. Also, kindly agreed to host a […]

dd + /dev/random fun

Friday, February 8th, 2008

From Adrien Lebre, who seems to be having fun working on kDFS: $ dd if=/dev/random of=file bs=1024 count=2 0+2 records in 0+2 records out 256 bytes (256 B) copied, 0.000705717 s, 363 kB/s $ ls -l file -rw-r–r– 1 lucas lucas 256 2008-02-08 17:53 file Can be easily explained using strace: open(“/dev/random”, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 0 […]

Re: a problem with tools

Friday, January 25th, 2008

Joey has a problem with tools used over dpkg-dev’s core tools to help maintainers maintain their debian packages. I was wondering about the adoption of those tools, so I simply grepped the logs from my last rebuild for “^Setting up $TOOL “, which is more accurate than looking at build-deps, since someteam-pkg-tools could depend on […]

Fixing build failures with dash is cool.

Sunday, January 20th, 2008

The bad thing with fixing build failures with dash is that there are still a lot of open bugs. (Remember, the 0-day NMU policy applies to those, so it’s a good opportunity to improve your NMU karma. And I will sponsor your NMUs if you can’t upload!). The good thing is that you sometimes run […]

Help us get rid of dash build failures in Debian!

Wednesday, January 16th, 2008

Following my rebuild of all packages using /bin/dash as /bin/sh, we now have a nice list of bugs. Those bugs are cool: The relaxed NMU rules apply to them, since they are part of the dash release goal. Which means that they can all be fixed using 0-day NMUs. Most of them are really easy […]

Rebuilding the archive with dash as /bin/sh

Saturday, January 5th, 2008

I rebuilt all Debian packages twice. The first time with bash as /bin/sh, and the second time with dash as /bin/sh. About 120 packages built fine with bash, but failed to build with dash. I filed all the bugs that weren’t filed already. Then I debdiff’d the resulting binary packages, and found about 40 packages […]

Ubuntu giving back to Debian: facts and numbers!

Wednesday, January 2nd, 2008

I’ve always been annoyed by the discussions about “is Ubuntu really giving back to Debian?”. Debian Developers usually don’t see a lot of “giving back”, and Ubuntu Developers complain about Debian Developers ignoring their bug reports and patches. So, a few months ago, I proposed that Ubuntu developers use a usertag when they report bugs […]

Is it hard for new contributors to help Debian? Can we improve things a bit?

Wednesday, December 19th, 2007

Debian could use more manpower, but is it actually easy for new contributors who would like to help to do useful things, and get the impression that they actually improved Debian? There are several problems here: Find bugs that are not too hard to fix. I don’t know about your packages, but in mine, there […]